Children who are brought up in families which do not have enough money are better prepared to deal with the problem of adult life than children who are brought up wealthy parents, discuss both views and your view.
Financial instability in families can be seen all over the world. An argument is there which states that the children who are suffering financial limitations from their infancy onward get a chance to face problems at adult age easily but the children who are wealthy have difficulty in dealing problems at their matured age. This essay analyses both view points and arrive at my personal conclusion.
On the one hand, it is a well-known fact that one of the formal Indian presidents Dr. K R Narayanan came from an impoverished family. There are lots of such kinds of examples in the history books and also in the society. Such children could learn and understand difficulties in life from their younger age. This experience could be implemented in their life easily. Thus this statement always comes true in our society.
Furthermore, wealthy children sometimes fail in their life due to more facilities being offered. To exemplify, children who have wealthy parents are always trying to give more money for their life betterment but in reality it is totally different. Most of the drug abuses are reporting from wealthy children. In addition, such students did not experience any troubled moments in their life. Therefore, they are being mislead their path and follow the enjoyments.
However, I totally disagree these both views due to several reasons. Firstly, it is an undeniable fact that, children’s life, mainly depends on how much moral values they get from their young age. This is not only for wealthy children’s life but also influences the poor community in a positive way. Thus, a moral and efficient environment enable everyone to cope up the problems in their life.
To conclude, it is a true fact that, atmosphere where children are brought up has negative and positive impact in their adult life. However, It is better to give more moral values in child’s life at earlier age that can foster an efficient generation in our society .
330 words, band 7
Some people prefer to help those who need it in local communities directly, However some people prefer to give money to national and international charitable organization. Which do you think better, discuss both view and your opinion?
In the globalized world it can be seen that a huge number of suffering people are seeking help from others. There are some multitude who think that it is better to select needy people from their surrounding but others prefer to provide donation to charity organisations. This essay will analyse both view points and finally give my personal opinion.
On the one hand , it is an undeniable fact that, our local communities include lots of poor people, who do not get right care from authorities and society. Hence , it is better to help those needy people from their own society because people who are willing to give donation as well as other sorts of help can ensure that it is reaching to the hands of genuine people. This kind of helping scheme ensures credible recipients for the amount donated as charity.
On the other hand, it is well-know fact that, people from region or society are struggling for some basic items like food, cloths shelter and so on. Perhaps the best example of would be Africa where can be seen that some world organisation come forward to help them through wealthy people. Such kinds of massive donation should only given to these kinds of credible organisation or charitable societies. Thus big charities have their own role in our society.
In my viewpoint, both types of charitable activities are good for well being of deprived community. It is essential to ensure that, this funds are given to needy people. Hence organisation must make their transaction more transparent. In addition local communities should extend their help for funding more needy people. Thus, both types of scheme can be helpful for our societal betterment.
320 WORDS , BAND 6.5
Buying things on the internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular. Do the merits of online shopping in this via outweigh than demerits.
In the twentieth century, technological boom can be seen everywhere. The main example is e-commerce through which people are always buying lots of things from the internet, such as flight tickets, reading materials and other essential items. However there are also many disadvantages behind this novel development. Here both the merits and demerits are being analyzed.
First and foremost, number of online shopping customers is increasing day by day. For instance, In 2010 developing countries like India had very few e-shopping sites but now it is difficult to take the numbers of companies in this area. When considering this increasing number it is apparent that business across the world in this sector is reaping benefits. Nowadays, people are very busy hence shopping from online platforms can save a significant amount of time. In addition, in the price rate a huge difference can be seen when comparing to offline market. Therefore online market gives a large amount benefits to human being.
Furthermore, it is well-known fact that physically challenged people find it difficult to purchase from markets. In such cases merits of online shopping cannot be denied. In the case of air tickets and train tickets people had to wait more time in queue to book tickets but now this difficulty is fading. In addition a reader can purchase books according to their interest from online very easily. Hence there are lots of merits in online purchasing.
However, there can be seen some disadvantages too. To exemplify, after booming of technology cyber crime has increased. Online intruders may hack and take valuable information such as bank details from people when shopping. However highly secured and authentic sites can not be hacked that easily. So owing to the multifarious benefits of online shopping, it is apparently not wastage of resource even if there are a few negative attributes.
To conclude, the e-commerce provide a wide range of benefits to people, this helps to save time as well as money.
350 words band 6
Students should pay their full university fees themselves as they benefit from having university studies and not the society as whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A nation standard mainly depend on educated citizen. There are some multitude claim that, the scholars who are studying at university is willing to pay their entire fee themselves and also not need to burden that fee from society. I completely disagree this statement due to, if students carried out their money, the rich community would be only get an education.
Firstly, it is an undeniable fact that, the education fare at universities are higher than compare to school , hence this big fare is difficult to adopt the normal person. Perhaps the best example of would be in the fee structure of medical seat in India, where average students only can study at merit seats, others seats carried out a huge amount of donation. Therefore, normal person cannot study high level of profession due to over burden.
Secondly, this scheme may be produce the ricer community to become more rich and poor region to more poor. The high university fare may be chance to reduce the education attraction from poor region, which has build negative impact on under developed community. This way the country might be developing a huge gap between wealthy and poor regions, hence this is not better for societal growth.
Finally, it is a well-known fact that, most of countries are willing to give their citizen to free education, sometimes, they offer free education and research scholarship to foreigners. For example, the country like Germany is fully, freely education to native and foreign people where, their fare from society, hence such place can see that high educated people.
To conclude, it is better to provide education fee from society or government. This not only useful for government, but helpful for students from lower region.
Environmental problems such as pollution and climatic variations are increasing nowadays. The governments have taken some measures at a global level. But they got only few solutions. Why is it so? How can this problem be solved?
In *this* contemporary era, pollution rates as well as climate changes are rising day by day why the authorities cannot take significant response to the world wide level? What are the measures have to solve this issue properly? This essay will analysis this both points.
Saving environment is not only the duty of government, but also *everyone's* responsibility, but nowadays, majority of *the* government cannot take individual decision to take solve this problem because of every country economy is directly depends on some multinational companies growth. It is the fact that, their main resource of that companies has been getting from environmental exploitation and also there are some laws are available for protection that companies policies. That is one of the reasons behind the government measures did not get more effect.
It is better to solve, *this issue by* international organizations. *they* must implement proper laws in ecological area. Perhaps the best example would be, recently, Kerala government ( a state of India ) banned the plastic bags in groceries. Which is helping to protect environment also very effective in waterlogging problem across the cities. Such kinds of initiate should be taken at international level for more protection, sometimes this is negatively affecting the production cost of items though government willing to give some subsidies for meet this issue. Moreover, government *should* support recycled energy source such as wind, solar, hydro electric power these are helping to protect the air pollution across the world.
To conclude, the authorities must implemented proper laws for supporting the economy and the environment *and* also *encourage* renewable energy sources.
Tourism has been a good source of revenue in many countries. Discuss its advantageous and disadvantageous?
The majority of countries , one of the best income source is the tourism, hence there is advantages outweigh than disadvantageous , but this essay will discuss both sides and finally include my view point also.
First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that, most of the *nation'* backbone of revenue income *comes* from tourism. This way *they* produce local jobs across the tourist place and also where the person’s life expectancy is rising. In addition, foreigner through of attachment help to get good culture, which may be reduced the bad customs approach of the local region. Moreover foreigner can enhance their cultural knowledge and also get high rich history and cultural person from this. Thus, which have a get significant benefits to every national as well as people.
However, it is a well-known fact that, some negative results *are* seen from promoting tourism in some places. Perhaps the best example would be that, indigenous customs are vanishing through promoting tourism in the local area, where people might be adopted the better customs from visitors, that attitude may be vanish some traditional customs across the tourist area.Other main negative result is that, when promoting tourism, the tourist area of business rising, where the natural resource of exploitation chance is high.
To conclude, In my point of view, It is generally known to all, *that* owing to the multifarious benefits from tourism, it has apparently noted that, even if there are some negative attributes from tourism. Therefore,it is better to encourage tourism across the world.
In most of the countries one of the best sources of income is tourism. I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will discuss both sides and finally include my view point also.
First and foremost, it is an undeniable fact that, in most of the nation, the backbone of revenue is tourism. Also, it ensures local jobs across the tourist places and also where the person’s life expectancy is rising(life expectancy do not have a relation with tourism). In addition, through communication with tourists from different parts of the world helps to get to know several cultures which results in a multicultural society that may abolish obsolete customs of local region. Moreover foreigners can enhance their cultural knowledge and also learn a variety of things. Thus, tourism has significant benefits to every nation as well as people.
However, it is a well-known fact that, some negative results can be seen while promoting tourism in some places. Perhaps the best example would be that, indigenous customs are vanishing through promoting tourism in the local area, where people might adopt better customs from visitors. This attitude may vanish some traditional customs across the tourist area. Another main negative result is that, when promoting tourism, though the local business in the tourist area may have a rise, the natural resource may go through exploitation.
To conclude in my point of view, it is generally known to all, while owing to the multifarious benefits of tourism, it has apparently noted that, even if there are some negative attributes merits are more. Therefore it is better to encourage tourism across the world.
People in all modern societies use drugs, but today's youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasing early ages. Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example.
Discuss the causes and some effects of widespread drug use by young people in modern day society. Make any recommendations you feel are necessary to help fight youth drug abuse.
In the contemporary era, majority of young people are addicted to drugs and cannabis. The figures rise day by day, so some multitudes claim that parents are often becoming bad examples due to the increased usage of drugs. I completely agree this point and this essay will discuss the main causes and effects of the drug abuse as well as the relevant remedies for mitigating the rate.
In the twentieth century, people are living in consumerist world, hence a significant number of media are now encouraging drugs for getting more funds. Perhaps the best example would be the, advertisement of live games like football, cricket and so on, whereas, they are including the liquor ads in every moment.(irrelevant points)
Furthermore, these kinds of advertisements can attract younger generation in a direct way. The usage of drugs is also showed in most of the movies, so the youth tries to imitate this. Moreover, family background and societal behavior might be other reasons behind alarmingly rising drug usage.
The main consequence of the drug usage is that, it is wrongly affecting user's mental and physical health. This kind of approach of youth indirectly affects the societal betterment. In addition, crime rate increases drastically in the societies, hence family's as well as society's peaceful atmosphere is vanishing and people may live in highly depressed way.
It is well-know fact that, by imposing strict law against the drug usage, drug abuse can be reduced to an extent. To exemplify, in India, usage of cannabis are strictly banned hence compare to Western world the mental related issues among the youth are very low. Moreover, authorities should provide moral value classes from grass root level. Through this way some off the drug related issues can be remedied.
To conclude, this is a big issue of modern times, therefore strict laws and moral classes are necessary to reduce drug usage among the youth.